The great debate on coal is one that we are still facing. It's unfortunate that our economics prevent us from moving away from coal. The number of people still supported per year by coal is just stunning. I always find it fascinating that we built our country's backbone on coal, yet we keep trying to keep other countries from developing the same way due to climate change, when we can't even quit coal ourselves.
I didn't realize that it took fourteen years to get to the point of making oil offshore. With that kind of timeline, it's no wonder that politics play heck on oil production in the US. I wanted to know more about the switchgrass used to create biofuel in marginal land. I know the struggle of balancing feeding people vs. creating energy is something that many people disagree on. Even with biofuel alternatives, it still appears that scale is our biggest issue in our energy needs.
We moved on from there to the oil sands. There he was talking about the challenges facing electric cars. While they have no noise, no transmission, they still require expensive batteries and extra electricity. So, while they may have no emissions, they are still drawing on the grid.
In Iceland, they have the unique opportunity to use geothermal. There are a couple of locations in the United States where this is possible, however, it is expensive to get started. Due to the requirement of geothermal activity, it's not a viable option for all.
Solar is a constantly changing relatively new option. It takes a few years to get a return on investment, but there are options that are coming out of it that are beneficial to all. He uses the example of a college campus where the bank owns the asset and sells power to campus for twenty years in a public/private partnership. Unfortunately, direct sunlight is required and it doesn't power many people per year.
In Denmark, they have been able to use the wind. Wind proves to be intermittent and it's difficult to store the energy. It still only powers 340,000 people per year. For economically and ag depressed areas in Texas, it's been a great economic stimulation, but in order to make 20% of the electricity, it would require the installation of 200,000 more turbines. It's expensive to transmit into urban areas and there is still the question of who pays for it.
Natural gas is a clean energy source, however the waste water makes it a topic of conflict. Fracking has been done for years. The process is now more improved, except in those rare extreme circumstances that create issues for the greater good of all. There is great concern that the waste water will contaminate entire water supplies. Our water supplies are limited.
Nuclear is the last energy source covered. France has been using their trash to burn for nuclear power. Unfortunately, nuclear really scares people. Nuclear waste, nuclear war, nuclear weapons. It IS scary. But it is also incredibly efficient.
In order to decrease our impact on the energy supply that we have, we would need to combine renewables with hydro. Nuclear and natural gas are up and coming and when combined with renewables, would be efficient. However, natural gas would have to double and nuclear would have be three times as many.
The most straightforward response to the energy crisis is to reduce our personal usage. Dr. Tinker states that energy we don't use is key. Changing our behavior is the most important part of our energy future. By changing the way we think about energy can decrease energy use by forty percent!!!